What is the full name of the MATech as given by its provider?
What is the acronym used for the MATech as given by its provider?
Please describe the MATech briefly (this text will be shown in the short profile of the technology on the repository)
Please provide a link to graphical descriptions of the MATech (photos, illustrations, videos)
What is the level of maturity of the MATech? (Technology Readiness Level, brief description here: https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/wp/2016_2017/annexes/h2020-wp1617-annex-g-trl_en.pdf) Please note that only TLR 4 or higher are eligible for inclusion in the ENABLE repository. If the MATech has not yet reached small scale prototype and you consider its inclusion would be useful, please contact the WG2 Steering Committee for discussion)
TLR 3 or less: basic to proof of concept TLR 4: Small scale prototype TLR 5: Large scale prototype TLR 6: Prototype system TLR 7: Demonstration system TLR 8: First commercial system TLR 9: Full commercial application
In what country is this MATech planned to be included in the ENABLE repository? (Please name the country you are representing in ENABLE, and describe only MATech developed/available in your country. For MATech available across countries, please contact the WG2 Steering Committee to coordinate across countries).
When did the MATech first become available for use? (use the date of publication, release, approval, etc. as you consider appropriate)
When did the most recent version/update of the MATech become available? (e.g. published, released, approved for use, etc.)
What is the identifier (number, name) of the current version of the MATech?
What is the brand name under which the MATech is made available?
Based on the previous question: If the intent of usability for this MATech is as a component of a larger solution or as a combination, please give here the details:
Based on the previous question: If yes, please detail or provide a link to relevant documents
Based on the previous question: Please detail the price or provide a link to relevant documents:
What is the name of the MATech provider?
Based on the previous question: Please detail phone number / address / other
The following entries record information about the use scenarios and types of users the technology is intended for, as well as the characteristics of the medication adherence measurement and/or intervention.
Adherence self-management use
These entries refer to scenarios in which the technology is used for adherence self-management activities
Based on the previous question: Please detail "other" who interacts with the MATech
The technology is appropriate for use by persons with the following level of functioning/impairment in memory functions (registering, storing, retrieving information):
no impairment mild impairment moderate impairment severe impairment complete impairment not specified not applicable
The technology is appropriate for use by persons with the following level of functioning/impairment in perception functions (recognizing and interpreting sensory stimuli):
no impairment mild impairment moderate impairment severe impairment complete impairment not specified not applicable
The technology is appropriate for use by persons with the following level of functioning/impairment in sensory functions - visual stimuli (light, form, shape, size, color):
no impairment mild impairment moderate impairment severe impairment complete impairment not specified not applicable
The technology is appropriate for use by persons with the following level of functioning/impairment in sensory functions - auditive stimuli (presence, location, pitch, loudness and quality of sounds):
no impairment mild impairment moderate impairment severe impairment complete impairment not specified not applicable
The technology is appropriate for use by persons with the following level of functioning/impairment in movement and mobility (of joints, bones, reflexes and muscles):
no impairment mild impairment moderate impairment severe impairment complete impairment not specified not applicable
These entries refer to scenarios in which the technology is used for activities supporting taking medication in an health/social care provision setting
The technology is intended to be used within an adherence support service, i.e. health/social care professionals may use it to support patients to take medication, for example in a care setting?
Yes No
These refer to types of diseases or health problems the technology/MATech is intended for.
These entries refer to the prescribed schematic form/ therapeutic plan of medication therapy, thus the type of medication regimen the technology/MATech can be used for
These entries refer to the the medication adherence management types and phases the MATech targets
Based on the previous question: Add comments in this open field
These refer to the way in which information is gathered and summarized by the technology about the patient's medication adherence
These entries refer to the component(s) of the adherence causal (logic) model that is measured by the technology
These entries aim to describe the ways in which the intervention is delivered to its users.
This entry refers to the modifiable causal influences on medication adherence (barriers and facilitators) that the MATech targets at the individual level, and the behaviour change techniques in includes to target these determinants.
Please provide a short description of how is the intervention component intended to influence changes in the target behaviour (what techniques it uses, what behavior determinants it aims to change).
This entry refers to the types of persons who use the technology to assist patients in their self-management of adherence.
This entry refers to the how the MATech has been developed and evaluated, considering aspects such as transparency, theory and evidence base, development guidelines, context
compatibility, co-creation, scientific evaluation, reliability and validity of measurement, usability, technical performance, aesthetics, readability, customisation, accessibility, data
protection, interoperability, authorisation status. While this information is the object of a more detailed (and optional) MATech description process for interested providers, a brief description would be welcome at this stage.
Please provide a short description of how the MATech has been developed and evaluated, in relation to its specific version and adherence-related content as described above. Please provide links to the key publications and documents accessible online, if appropriate.
Please add your feedback on the data collection form in relation to this MATech. Did you experience any difficulties in collecting information on these topics? Were response options and guidance appropriate? What would be your suggestions for better adapting this form to describing this particular MATech?
Send